Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:17:10 +0300
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, "Charles A. Landemaine" <landemaine@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Ask for FreeBSD support here! Let's join forces!
Message-ID:  <20060824181710.GA36711@gothmog.pc>
In-Reply-To: <20060820154624.51391ddf@localhost>
References:  <e6575a30608192022u44812b59pe6c22314a1ee7b80@mail.gmail.com> <20060820180109.23C422395F@outbound.sentinare.net> <e6575a30608201225r83cc728je1475493525febc1@mail.gmail.com> <20060820154624.51391ddf@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-08-20 15:46, Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006, at 16:25:21 -0300, Charles A. Landemaine wrote:
> > On 8/20/06, Don Witt <witt@cylogistics.com> wrote:
> > > The next release of Adobe flash developer will have a revised
> > > license which will include FreeBSD. This was per the product
> > > manager.
> >
> > License is not the most important. What is important for the end user
> > is having a native version of his own operating system :)

Agreed.

> I read this last month:
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/07/api_review.html
>
> The using ALSA for sound in version 9 doesn't sound very good for
> getting it to work on FreeBSD even if/when the license allows it. I
> don't understand why it's so hard for them to make it compatible with
> more OSes. They are in the business of selling software to create
> content in their proprietary Flash format, but if that can't be viewed
> on every common OS, then I think/know developers will not develop
> exclusively in Flash as much.

I'm probably stating the blatantly obvious, but the trick is how we can
convince them that FreeBSD is a "common OS", I guess :)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060824181710.GA36711>