Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:11 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> To: User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x Message-ID: <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday December 11, 2006 at 05:09:01 (PM) James Long wrote: > By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and > and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a response > to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. Maybe it is just me, but I hate that Cc crap. I always end up with two copies of the same message. Unless the individual specifically requests to be Cc'd, I never utilize it. Besides, how hard is it to subscribe to a list, post your question and hopefully receive a satisfactory response and then terminate your association with the list if you are so inclined. I joined the 'Apache' forum just to get one simple answer, then exited. Not a big deal at all. Just my 2ยข. -- Gerard "When in doubt, cop an attitude."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061211175301.17B7.GERARD>