Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:04:49 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken linuxulator in -current as of Jan 8 17:51:45 CET Message-ID: <20070109220449.GA41262@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <89559334@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <57417212@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070108180014.GA4540@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20070108210813.368389dc@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070109204604.62915dc7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <89565167@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109213151.2bf5a8f3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <46677978@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <80597611@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109210153.GA35342@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <89559334@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > but as I see it the program opens the libraries in the right order. > > > but it "refuses" the correct library and keeps searching. I think > > the problem is in the "refusing". > > It refuses the library 'cause it's too new one (maybe that's why you > succeeded with 2.6.16 linux.osrelease -- linuxulator didn't throw this > lib away) and keeps searching for an old one but eats a new FreeBSD > one. what do you mean by "too new one" ? why it worked before with exactly the same library? > > One thing is very strange - I was able to use acroread on 2 days > > old current and now I am running 2 months old current and I am > > not able to run it. can anyone think of what can cause this? > > It should be an another case. What is the diagnostic? it looked exactly the same as now
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070109220449.GA41262>