Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:14:29 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up Message-ID: <200703051314.29902@aldan> In-Reply-To: <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing = > will panic. = = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its = consumers. Then removing the -M flag and making swap backing the = default is a very sound choice. Thank you for correcting me. Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Someone still needs to look into the panic... Who would that be? -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200703051314.29902>