Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:05:06 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: manuel.ochoa@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Wireshark Message-ID: <200703172005.12027.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <826528.78192.qm@web58011.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <826528.78192.qm@web58011.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart4050492.1Evy7u8IXb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 17 March 2007 19:16, manuel.ochoa@yahoo.com wrote: > Can someone please explain the difference between Wireshark and > Wireshark-lite. I would like to install a packet sniffer on my FreeBSD > box for CLI only. Thanks, What's wrong with tcpdump(8)? Other than that building either the real or= =20 the -lite version with "WITHOUT_X11" defined will get you the=20 cli-version. "-lite" seems to just disable a couple of dissectors that=20 have a lot of external dependencies. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart4050492.1Evy7u8IXb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF/DvoXyyEoT62BG0RAiAiAJ9lgTdUgDoIISC8NAc6QTagvSDscgCffrSl MwKbJPs6WIfx224Ms8BHyFk= =5nAr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4050492.1Evy7u8IXb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200703172005.12027.max>