Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:47:08 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de Cc: arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: if_ate handles the bytes of the MAC address in a "wrong" order Message-ID: <20070609.094708.-2034663768.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <51831.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181397815.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> References: <59832.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181391583.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> <20070609123941.GJ16463@cicely12.cicely.de> <51831.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181397815.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think these patches are basically good. I gotta think about how I wanna roll these into the kernel as I have units in the field that upgrading their boot loader would be awkward... Why do you look at all four SA registers, but only pick the first non-zero one? Why is that going to he better than just looking at the first one? Until FreeBSD can support muliple MAC addresses, I'm not sure I see the point... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070609.094708.-2034663768.imp>