Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:45:04 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Volker <volker@vwsoft.com> Cc: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" <wundram@beenic.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD violates RFC2870 [was: Re: Problems with named default configuration in 6-STABLE] Message-ID: <20070717114504.GA78231@eos.sc1.parodius.com> In-Reply-To: <469C9E56.8070705@vwsoft.com> References: <200707162319.41724.lofi@freebsd.org> <200707171005.37507.wundram@beenic.net> <469C835B.6090304@vwsoft.com> <200707171106.30795.wundram@beenic.net> <469C9E56.8070705@vwsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Volker wrote: > As I think having a default to hint root zone is better, I'll file a > PR about that. Which leads me to ask: Why hasn't anyone recommended using stub zones for this? It seems the goal is to cache NS records from the rootservers, and stub zones don't utilise AXFR/IXFR. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070717114504.GA78231>