Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom <freebsd@philip.pjkh.com> To: Jerahmy Pocott <quakenet1@optusnet.com.au> Cc: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BASH as root shell (static linking) Message-ID: <20071005162851.X8934@bravo.pjkh.com> In-Reply-To: <1960C310-B558-484E-927A-4AAC273621D6@optusnet.com.au> References: <2F42244C-6F3F-48B3-AC05-FF068A791324@optusnet.com.au> <20071005204531.40afed9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <1960C310-B558-484E-927A-4AAC273621D6@optusnet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: > >> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 >> Jerahmy Pocott <quakenet1@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically >>> linked >> >> I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist >> precisely for this purpose. > > Yeah, I'v done that in the past, but I really dislike csh, I don't want to > use > it EVER =p Use sudo... and alias 'su' to 'sudo -H bash'. That's what I do... but can always fall back to the default if necessary.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071005162851.X8934>