Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:49 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <wearabnet@yahoo.ca> Subject: Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future? Message-ID: <20071017224049.GA48997@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60710171525m6d6b3ecey6b797fa3b245b88@mail.gmail.com> References: <132802.25776.qm@web33711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20071017173941.GT5411@hoeg.nl> <20071017182758.GU5411@hoeg.nl> <20071017203438.GA37057@freebsd.org> <3e1162e60710171428i1c28c7a5ha285a4d4ea8f5ce5@mail.gmail.com> <20071017215241.GA97384@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3e1162e60710171525m6d6b3ecey6b797fa3b245b88@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#license > > Google's not broken at all thanks... First hit for llvm-gcc shows the > following. > And, the first hit of llvm is the llvm home page. Read it and the FAQ link above and you'll find that llvm isn't derived from GCC. > Are dictionaries broken in your little corner of the net? I prefer my good old Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, which is sitting 2 feet to my left. That fact that the llvm project uses the GCC C/C++ frontends does not means that llvm is a derivative of GCC. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071017224049.GA48997>