Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080528175610.0ffe4c1c.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20080528002823.GA63696@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080528002823.GA63696@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit? PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions without PY> documentation as different revisions require different workaround. PY> Anyway, would you try this one? The patch was generated against HEAD PY> but it would apply to STABLE too. PY> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080519 Well, I tested this one with some success: After booting the patched system, my re0-Interface was working fine, at least I could transmit GBs of data without getting the problems mentioned before. :-) However, on the other hand re1 did not work at all :-(. The interface was up and running, has an IP and everything, but I could not get a single packet from or to it. After trying everything I could think of, I rebooted the machine. Then both interfaces were working again. Therefore, the errors described above when transmitting large amounts of data are back. :-( Somehow the two interfaces seem to interfer with each other. Can I provide further information for fixing this? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080528175610.0ffe4c1c.gerrit>