Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:57:06 -0400
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        "FreeBSD Questions" <ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Ports and 64-bit Processors
Message-ID:  <20080829105706.cb72b17d.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <10549b080808290744u659d89f9m4c959a968cbe17e1@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <10549b080808290744u659d89f9m4c959a968cbe17e1@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to "FreeBSD Questions" <ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com>:

> FreeBSD has supported 64-bit architectures for a while now...  Alpha
> and UltraSPARC come to mind--even if Alpha is no longer a Tier 1
> architecture.  I'm surprised to hear so many of you say that certain
> ports are broken on AMD64.  I would think if they worked on other
> 64-bit processors they'd work on AMD64.  Were the ports that are
> broken on AMD64 also broken on those other architectures, too?

Most of the ports I've had problems with are desktop applications.
Stuff that doesn't often get installed/used on 64 bit.  It's been a
while since we've tried (about 1 year) but Gnome was pretty unstable
on 64 bit at the time.

Can't say if this is universal across all 64 bit platforms.

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080829105706.cb72b17d.wmoran>