Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:08:05 -0500 From: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? Message-ID: <20081202170805.GA20420@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <20081202110922.T14849@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> <gh1erh$n6s$1@ger.gmane.org> <4934E276.3050308@comcast.net> <9bbcef730812020120w539a8f14jc496b14c2fbd52ad@mail.gmail.com> <20081202110922.T14849@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar(wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.12.02 11:09:53 +0100: >>> What about DragonFlyBSD's new HAMMER FS? I hear it has similar capabilities >>> as ZFS without the overhead. Though, strangely, I haven't really heard >>> anyone discuss it even though it was released some months ago. > > it's maybe pre-pre-prerelease. > > it's not finished yet. It's already usable on DragonFly. DragonFLY itself is stable, but only supports one CPUIt probably will never be ported to FreeBSD due to API differences.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202170805.GA20420>