Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:06:39 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: david@catwhisker.org Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 -> ghostscript-8.70 failed Message-ID: <20091221.020639.114287386.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20091220133238.GR470@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <20091220131840.GQ470@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20091220132731.GA94787@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091220133238.GR470@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Dec_21_02_06_39_2009_390)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote in <20091220133238.GR470@bunrab.catwhisker.org>: da> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: da> > ... da> > > (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ da> > > does seem to be populated with several other files.) da> > da> > is this i386? da> da> Aye.... da> da> > I reported this already for sparc and ia64: da> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html da> da> Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 da> and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE was enabled regardless of the platform. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Dec_21_02_06_39_2009_390)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAksuWZ8ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3azQCbBTEkEP/exd7hrZdIpE7XtxUc F60AoJR5tW61L8GtnvwoUETXapFFgEhb =vrr+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Dec_21_02_06_39_2009_390)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091221.020639.114287386.hrs>