Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:09:46 -0700 From: Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com> To: Gustau P??rez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> Cc: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver Message-ID: <20100524210945.GE1295@weongyo> In-Reply-To: <4BF54F93.9000409@entel.upc.edu> References: <20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo> <20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua> <20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu> <20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu> <20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo> <58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo> <4BF54F93.9000409@entel.upc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote: > >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to > >>> read and work email and wireless stuffs. > >>> > >>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in > >>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP. > >>> > >> The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching > >> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to > >> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics. > >> > >> It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is > >> not busy?" > >> > >> I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision). > >> > >> Do you want me to test anything else ? > > > > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached > > patch? > > > > regards, > > Weongyo Jeong > > > I've just updated to FreeBSD 8.1 PRERELEASE and I see the > unsupported rate problem again. I applied the patch for CURRENT and it > works. So I guess the patch was not MFC in the 8.1 branch. It's MFCed today. > However it still works slow (betwenn 200 and 300 kbytes/s). I tried > using a rum dongle with the same AP (which is a 8.0-STABLE system with > an Atheros card) and works great when uploading (2Mb sustained). Umm. I have no clue why this is happened currently. When I found any hints I'll let you know. Thank you. > In my laptop I see now messages like these : > > bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x1) You could ignore this messages because bwn(4) doesn't support H/W crypto and it looks it's harmless. > If you want me to try anything, let me know. Regards, Weongyo Jeong
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100524210945.GE1295>