Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:11:56 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin <jpg@gnix.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: virtualbox 4.0 Message-ID: <20110721171156.GN5129@think.gnix.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107210723130.95135@wonkity.com> References: <CADtYmig_gs9YHK5qioLyx-yBZ_%2BGSp_Vod%2BZvTC4Y4SdV7gH=g@mail.gmail.com> <4E280F06.6080102@infracaninophile.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107210723130.95135@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > Recent versions of VirtualBox claim to be able to run a 64-bit VM on a > 32-bit host if the host CPU is 64-bit and has hardware virtualization > support: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?p=33940 > (search for "64-bit guest") > So far I've only seen guest kernel panics when booting the kernel on an > E8400 i386 FreeBSD host. I was using VB in a set-up like that up until a few weeks ago. I worked well I have to say but I couldn't get a full screen and in the end I installed dual-boot instead. This was with Win7(32bit) as the host, FreeBSD(64bit) as guest. I didn't try FreeBSD as host because I read that it's lacking USB support for the moment.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110721171156.GN5129>