Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 May 2014 08:18:30 -0500
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: POLA.. missing --sysroot option in ld?
Message-ID:  <20140501131830.GA9578@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <E10D9559-B76F-438F-8157-CD423EF49CE0@gmail.com>
References:  <536061A9.7030502@freebsd.org> <53607ABD.1000605@freebsd.org> <E10D9559-B76F-438F-8157-CD423EF49CE0@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02:31PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>=20
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On 4/30/14, 10:36 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> In our 8.0 based systems at $JOB our build environment made heavy use =
of the --sysroot option in gcc and ld.
> >>=20
> >> We are trying to move up to a newer release but suddenly the --sysroot=
 option has disappeared.
> >>=20
> >> we get the message "/usr/bin/ld: this linker was not configured to use=
 sysroots"
> > more spefically the following command (from 'configure') fails on "near=
 9"
> > and succeeds on 8.0.
> >=20
> > configure:3352: /usr/bin/gcc -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter  -nostdinc -is=
ystem /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/include --sysroot /usr/bu=
ild/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4 -Wall -Wno-unused-parame
> > ter  -nostdinc -isystem /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/inc=
lude --sysroot /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4  --sysroot /usr/buil=
d/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4 -L/usr/build/buildroot/too
> > ls/x86_gcc4.2.4/lib -L/usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/lib c=
onftest.c >&5
> >>=20
> >> Does anyone know what happened?  and when, and by who?
> >> I have looked in the Makefiles and configuration files in SVN and I ca=
n't see a change that would have done this..
> >> of course the building of these tools is rather complex so I may have =
missed some place..
>=20
> Yea, I looked too and don?t see anything. I thought it was broken in more=
 like 2005 not 2011. You?re only hope is to bisect the tree down to the cha=
nge that caused it?

It's been broken since at least the last binutils import and probably
longer since the inane ld behavior of activating --sysroot only when
built with a specified sysroot is from upstream.  The fix is trivial, just
merge r257268 and r257530 to the branch you are using.

-- Brooks

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iKYEARECAGYFAlNiSaZfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1NUQ1MTlDMjZBNzgyRTcyNTI5OUJGMDVE
OEU4QkU5RjIzODFBRDQACgkQXY6L6fI4GtSUuwCfQ2Nz6YJ4HgYusrNSoArrpSK8
LEIAn2Bd8gDAxqU2qHYWT8VTLXOh3kcX
=t2pm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140501131830.GA9578>