Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:14:32 +0300 From: Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org> To: Jonathan Anderson <jonathan@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Subject: Re: There is currently no usable release of FreeBSD. Message-ID: <20140604231432.a5581f5a50f8d7e1611f9736@systemdatarecorder.org> In-Reply-To: <538F5FB5.9060008@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com> <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li> <538F5FB5.9060008@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is the problem actually that we're using the term "legacy", which some > vendors use to mean "unsupported"? Perhaps we ought to say: better approach: stable: 8.4, 9.2, 10.0 current: 11.0 It should be clear listed what are the stable releases, can be many, and what are the future releases as well. Simple keep two naming conventions for whats stable and ready for production and what is coming next. -- Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140604231432.a5581f5a50f8d7e1611f9736>