Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:05:51 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, sjg@juniper.net Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG=rPVct-HzOksM2KQvPuOdf4zgZo__=Oannh0x%2B_JVHEzQyyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >host with bmake? You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install bmake itself, so that ports can use it. I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to stable/9 at this point. >I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so th >at >I can build ports inside the jail with poudriere. Why not use fmake in that scenario?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140617200551.07542580A1>