Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:28:59 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Borodin Oleg <onborodin@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports. Message-ID: <20170609072859.GK43031@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20170609092338.1dfcf932@gmail.com> References: <20170609092338.1dfcf932@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I ask for little advice. > I wrote web manager X.509 certificates http://minica.unix7.org/ and created a freebsd port for it. > > 1. Who could check quality and security of this code? The committer would check the port quality etc. Security would be the task of 'the many eyes of open source'. I think there's no other, realistic way to get a code review. > 2. If quality the code is sufficient to be included in freebsd ports, then: > For the port it is necessary patches for two perl-ports ("good patches, yes" =), > what is the order of my actions? Submit patches via bugs.freebsd.org for the two ports, and the maintainers will decide if they include them. Submit a shar file for the new port, also via bugs.freebsd.org. Post the PR numbers as a followup to this mail 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170609072859.GK43031>