Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 07:03:20 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Adam David <adam@spiral.veda.is>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.local Message-ID: <21447.867247400@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 17:55:33 %2B0400." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970625174655.29263A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Why? It not breaks anything and not cause any sufficient slowdown we can > talk about seriously. > I think all rc variables must be accessible from any rc* script for > completeness. I agree. Now can we end this discussion-from-hell please? :-) I've noted before that it's always the smallest changes which incite the greatest number of follow-ups, and we frequently see the situation where something like NFS or the audio subsystem is just crawling with bogons and nobody says spit about them. Then someone makes a small, relatively cosmetic change and everybody is on their chairs, exerting tremendous energy on the issue. I would respectfully suggest that a lot of people's energies are being sadly misdirected and they need to focus more on the genuine evils still lurking on our source tree if they've got so much time and energy to spare. ;) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21447.867247400>