Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 10:59:24 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning Message-ID: <356a9f0a.251653824@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980526011905.342H-100000@localhost> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980526011905.342H-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 May 1998 01:23:15 -0400 (EDT), Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> wrote: >> > > BTW, what's you opinion of egcs? >> > >> > It seems to have frequent ups and downs. >I don't know if it counts as a very persuasive data point, but a real >large port of mine, octave, won't build under egcs (I got an internal >compiler error for which I submitted a bug report). Gcc-2.8.1 compiled >and ran it fine The "e" in egcs does stand for experimental. The NetBSD developers must be confident the bugs will shake out soon since they are planning to move to egcs, or they must think the benefits are worth the bugs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?356a9f0a.251653824>