Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:14:17 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Core's function (was: The Project and onward [was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c]) Message-ID: <3794.984471257@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:10:03 %2B1030." <20010313121002.F59348@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010313121002.F59348@wantadilla.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >> I'm not sure I like the idea of an architectural board per se, because I >> think that architectural discussions can work fine with our current >> forums. > >It took me longer than most to agree to this viewpoint, but I do now. >Yes, it's a good idea to have an architectural board, but why should >it be less than the committers as a whole? Because, sometimes getting 200 people to agree is just not possible, and yet a decision must be made. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3794.984471257>