Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:12:49 +0100
From:      Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de>
To:        L.Bartoletti <lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org>
Cc:        <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Flavor or not for this port?
Message-ID:  <37d007c1-0315-5b23-7357-5dc3fcb836fc@gwdg.de>
In-Reply-To: <46cbd287-186f-9b92-f2a7-d6884c681040@gwdg.de>
References:  <a181e71d-fdd0-7807-f129-29711c3ee8b5@tuxfamily.org> <46cbd287-186f-9b92-f2a7-d6884c681040@gwdg.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 02.11.2017 um 07:41 schrieb Rainer Hurling:
> Am 02.11.2017 um 07:13 schrieb L.Bartoletti:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-*
>>
>> Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have
>> flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a
>> x11-toolkits/qwt6-qt5 (like security/qtkeychain-qt{4,5} ?)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Loïc
> 
> 
> Hi Loïc,
> 
> Thanks for your dedication. I am very interested in a qwt6-qt5 port,
> since it is needed for the upcoming version 3.0 of graphics/qgis :)
> 
> Sorry for my inexperience. In case of adding the qwt6-qt5 as a flavor,
> should we expect any change or restriction in the way, it would be used
> as a dependency of e.g. QGIS?
> 
> Thanks for any answer.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Rainer

Hi Loïc,

Again about x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-*

Now, that we have our first real world experiences with FLAVORS, it
seems to be functional to use flavors in this context. Something like

x11-toolkits/qwt6@qt4
x11-toolkits/qwt6@qt5

A bit tricky could be, that USE_QT* are different in both cases:

USE_QT4= corelib gui opengl svg xml moc_build
USE_QT5= core gui opengl svg xml printsupport qmake_build widgets

What do you think?

Best wishes,
Rainer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37d007c1-0315-5b23-7357-5dc3fcb836fc>