Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:26:12 -0700
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        josb@cncdsl.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND
Message-ID:  <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com>
References:  <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> > > Please don't.  DJBDNS lacks significant and important functionality
> > > for all but trivial (one controller or single zone) uses.
> >
> > Maybe you should tell Dan what functionality you think is missing, and see
> > what he says. There are very good reasons behind djbdns's current feature set.
> 
> I think the license is a show stopper, anyway.  Somwthing so basic
> has got to be locally hackable, and the hacked code has got to be
> distributable.

Some of the assumptions behind the operation of djbdns may not hold true
for your installation.  That, along with the unmaintainability of the
software fails to convince me it is a viable replacement for BIND.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A90CA94.D7CBCB65>