Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:33:24 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, qa@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cputype=486 Message-ID: <3AAD78E4.75B12D7@cup.hp.com> References: <XFMail.010312124506.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <3AAD394D.49597B93@cup.hp.com> <20010312.21272700@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> <3AAD485E.272DF239@cup.hp.com> <20010312.22211700@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> <3AAD53EA.F71920E8@cup.hp.com> <20010312.23010600@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> <3AAD6AB5.889C73F8@cup.hp.com> <20010312190530.A14665@lerami.lerctr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Larry Rosenman wrote: > THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. > > Either make the cross-archetecture stuff work, or remove CPUTYPE! You're forgetting that you're not actually doing any cross-architecture stuff. It's much easier to fix if a pentium was considered a different architecture than i486. It's not; hence the frustration... In my reply to the "splitting make.conf" thread on -arch, I mentioned something I called modes. Whether that's a good name is totally irrelevant at this time. What is relevant is that modes *may* save us here. Not that it'll help us for 4.3, because it'll probably involve some serious work, but it's one possible way to have cross-building be more finegrained than only looking at the architecture. No doubt, other solutions will exist as well that may even be more simple... -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AAD78E4.75B12D7>