Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:13:02 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile distinfo pkg-plistpkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 ports/x11/XFree86-4/files patch-dpatch-xthreads ports/x11/XFree86-4/scripts configure Message-ID: <3AB5CD9E.5C20D418@FreeBSD.org> References: <200103180320.f2I3KvI95990@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > jmz 2001/03/17 19:20:57 PST > > Modified files: > x11/XFree86-4 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 > x11/XFree86-4/files patch-d patch-xthreads > x11/XFree86-4/scripts configure > Log: > Upgrade to version 4.0.3 > - patch-0 replaced by 'MAKE_ARGS=' in Makefile > - XF86Setup is no more supported in XFree-4, so patch-8 is removed as well > as corresponding stuff in scripts/configure > - patch-config_cf_Server_tmpl replaced by the setting of InstallXserverSetUID > in scripts/configure > other removed patches are no more necessary. > > Note that freetype2 is now part of the base 4.0.3 distribution. The > freetype2 include and libs files are always installed. Huh, I'm not sure that it is a Good Thing [tm]. Are the library/includes installed customized somehow by the XFree project, or it just a stock versions? If the latter, then we probably should disable freetype2 building/installation along with XFree86 and use stock version from the freetype2 port, because creating a namespace conflict between freetype2 and XFree86 is a definitely a bad thing and we all agreed about that some time ago when 4.0.2 was released. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AB5CD9E.5C20D418>