Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:16:27 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped Message-ID: <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <40A37468.3060608@cronyx.ru> <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
May I ask you to make some tests for me? We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4) drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4). I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests for you. rik Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:13:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > > >>M. Warner Losh wrote: >> >> >>>In message: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> >>> Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> writes: >>>: Does any body workin on support for memory mapped serial adapters? >>> >>>uart should support it. You may be able to enhance puc to attach uart >>>to your card. >>> >>> >>I didn't notice that mem-cards have uart(4) type in puc(4) driver when I >>started to dig. >> >> >They don't. uart(4) is a replacement for sio(4), not a an addendum to it. > > >>I was sure that it should be sio part. >> >> >So was I. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40A4E2CB.2000007>