Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:34:02 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@web.de> Cc: FreeBSD-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: modularization Message-ID: <4164106A.70901@cronyx.ru> In-Reply-To: <41640CEE.9070900@web.de> References: <41640CEE.9070900@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Waldemar Kornewald wrote: > Hi, > are there any plans to mularize the netstack (maybe: > protocol+interface modules)? You mean smth like (device driver)+ng_cisco+ng_iface or what? rik > Would it be difficult to modularize it? > > I am also interested in your opinion about it: > Does it make sense to modularize the netstack? Why would a > monolithic/modular netstack be better? > > We at Haiku are inclined towards modular systems, but the question > whether it is needed for a netstack came up on our ML, so I wanted to > hear what your situtation and opinion about this topic is. > > Thank you. > > Bye, > Waldemar Kornewald > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4164106A.70901>