Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:40:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ATA rman performance enhancement Message-ID: <41D99FBD.8070500@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <41D984A5.7010408@root.org> References: <41D984A5.7010408@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson wrote: > While doing some benchmarking of other code, I noticed that there were = a=20 > lot of calls to rman_get_bustag/handle(). They weren't taking up much = > actual time since they're pretty lightweight but seemed to be unnecessa= ry. >=20 > I worked up the attached diff and benchmarked it. There are about 1000= =20 > calls a second to the rman routines without this patch and essentially = > none with it. It makes about a 1% difference in throughput under some = > IO loads. It is only for non-Promise or non-SII controllers right now = > since I didn't extend the initialization step to more than ata-pci.c.=20 > The same approach could be used for the other INW/OUTW calls as well bu= t=20 > they're not in the fast path. I think it may make more of a difference= =20 > with small reads. >=20 > Feel free to test, cleanup, and commit. I had something semilar to this once back when, but since HW got lots=20 faster I couldn't measure it anymore, but maybe things has changed... Anyhow it needs to be applied to ata-isa.c ata-card.c ata-cbus.c etc to=20 not break anything at least. I'll think about it and eventually do=20 something about it in ATA-mkIII if it really is mesureable again.. --=20 -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41D99FBD.8070500>