Date: 21 Mar 2002 16:05:46 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DB Authentication Message-ID: <443cytk4wl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <00b001c1d009$6a1f3e00$2aa8a8c0@melim.com.br> References: <20020319123257.H23375@sjt-u10.cisco.com> <20020319123717.6b13ab8c.Zapper@FoxChat.Net> <033c01c1cf6d$a44c8e30$2aa8a8c0@melim.com.br> <44it7squbm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <00b001c1d009$6a1f3e00$2aa8a8c0@melim.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Ronan Lucio" <ronan@melim.com.br> writes: > I need to do this to create new options like, the user maintain his > own account by himself, and I=B4ve been some tests with passwd file, > but the passwd file have corrupted some times with simultaneous > access. The password commands lock the passwd database themselves, so this seems unlikely. > I looking for the easier (faster) way to get it and I should to know > if I must use pam.pgsql ou pam.ldap. I don't know about faster; the default method uses a hashed database, and it's unlikely that an SQL database would be able to beat it for speed.=20 > I=B4ve seem many people saing that ldap is hard to make it work, but > I don=B4t know if I use pam.pgsql I=B4ll do all servirces authenticate. This may turn out to be a good question. If they use the recommended functions for accessing authentication functionality, it should just work, but there may be some unconverted services around. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?443cytk4wl.fsf>