Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:12:01 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tar Makefile bsdtar.c bsdtar.h bsdtar_platform.h config_freebsd.h getdate.y matching.c read.c tree.c util.c write.c src/usr.bin/tar/test config.sh test-acl.sh test-basic.sh test-deep-dir.sh test-flags.sh test-nodump.sh ... Message-ID: <45F46291.4090209@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200703111036.l2BAaha6031394@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200703111036.l2BAaha6031394@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> kientzle 2007-03-11 10:36:43 UTC > FreeBSD src repository > bsdtar 2.0.23: > * read.c now relies on security checks in libarchive instead > of trying to do its own... Bsdtar should now be considerably faster than before. I put a lot of effort over the last few months into streamlining the code in libarchive to recreate objects on disk. I'd appreciate any feedback on the performance of this latest bsdtar when restoring archives. I'm particularly interested in performance compared to GNU tar for uncompressed archives with and without the "-P" option (which disables the security checks). Cheers, Tim Kientzle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45F46291.4090209>