Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:22:09 -0900 From: Peter Giessel <pgiessel@mac.com> To: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? Message-ID: <46703346351880256269680332892534375073-Webmail@me.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than >> > FreeBSD (it's their goal)... >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/dfly.html >> >> Good luck to them, they need it :) >> > >That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet. So? Look at just the UP scores then. From the above page: "UP performance on FreeBSD 7 is 2.6 times higher than dragonfly UP performance and 1.8 times higher than freebsd 4 UP performance." Please explain how DragonFly's lack of SMP affects the UP performance? Also, from an end user perspective, you can hardly get a computer these days that only has one core. SMP performance is very relevant from that perspective.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46703346351880256269680332892534375073-Webmail>