Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:23:34 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
To:        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Tarick <tungan@ukr.net>
Subject:   Re: panic in AcpiExReleaseMutex
Message-ID:  <4B189CD6.30906@icyb.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F26CF@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
References:  <4B178387.4050601@icyb.net.ua> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F26CF@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 04/12/2009 06:57 Moore, Robert said the following:
>> I am somewhat suspicious of recursive use of \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0.MUT1
> 
> It is OK for AML code to acquire a mutex multiple times, so I don't think that is the problem.
> 
>>    PreviousSyncLevel =
>>        WalkState->Thread->AcquiredMutexList->Mutex.OriginalSyncLevel;
> 
> Multiple pointers here, do you know which one is null?
> 

It must be AcquiredMutexList, because WalkState->Thread is checked for NULL a
few lines above.


-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B189CD6.30906>