Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:38:47 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't load smbfs kernel module Message-ID: <4B5DC917.3080605@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64 > > I've built a kernel with smbfs module: > > # ls -al /boot/kernel/smb* > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols > > but can't load it: > > # kldload smbfs > kldload: can't load smbfs: No such file or directory > > > Other modules load fine with kldload, e.g.: Does it make any difference to use the ".ko" extension, to call it by absolute path, or to use "-v" for more information, per The Friendly Manual? Certainly no expert. Wondering tho, as I don't know if the kernel maintains a list of "new" objects if they've been recently added. Hate to ask if you've done a reboot :-) Also, for curiosity, `file /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko`? > All I need is to mount an MS WIndows partition to my fbsd box. > > Please advise > > many thanks > anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B5DC917.3080605>