Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 May 2010 17:04:51 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>, weongyo@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver
Message-ID:  <4BF54F93.9000409@entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo>
References:  <20100228095259.GB3536@weongyo>	<20100301103240.3a4aac8a.ray@dlink.ua>	<20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo>	<20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua>	<20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu>	<20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu>	<20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo>	<58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
>>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
>>> read and work email and wireless stuffs.
>>>
>>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch?  It looks in
>>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP.
>>>
>>   The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching
>> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to
>> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics.
>>
>>   It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is
>> not busy?"
>>
>>   I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision).
>>
>>   Do you want me to test anything else ?
>
> OK.  The patch is ready to test.  Could you please test it with attached
> patch?
>
> regards,
> Weongyo Jeong
>
   I've just updated to FreeBSD 8.1 PRERELEASE and I see the
unsupported rate problem again. I applied the patch for CURRENT and it
works. So I guess the patch was not MFC in the 8.1 branch.

   However it still works slow (betwenn 200 and 300 kbytes/s). I tried
using a rum dongle with the same AP (which is a 8.0-STABLE system with
an Atheros card) and works great when uploading (2Mb sustained).

   In my laptop I see now messages like these :

            bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x1)

   If you want me to try anything, let me know.

   Regards,

   Gus


- --
PGP KEY : http://www-entel.upc.edu/gus/gus.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=QJQr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF54F93.9000409>