Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:38:32 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: BSD grep fixes Message-ID: <4C5040E8.3050304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJiV1s3KNsCKsqT_dNiqMyRuOFpK47AD4QyMUO@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimJiV1s3KNsCKsqT_dNiqMyRuOFpK47AD4QyMUO@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 2010.07.27. 5:59, b. f. escreveu: > Other important differences between bsdgrep and GNU grep: > > The --include option in bsdgrep does not have the same effect as the > corresponding option in GNU grep -- in GNU grep, that option causes > _only_ those files matching the file inclusion pattern to be searched. > To obtain the same behavior in bsdgrep, one must issue something like > --exclude '*' --include pattern. > > The effect of multiple overlapping --include and --exclude options is > different in the two greps. It would be wise to add comments about > precedence of such options in the bsdgrep manpage, as is done, for > example, in bsdtar(1). > Thanks for bringing this up, I'll take a look and try to implement the same behaviour. And I will also document the behaviour. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C5040E8.3050304>