Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:11:54 -0400 From: Graham Todd <gtodd@bellanet.org> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing. Message-ID: <4C878B9A.2000909@bellanet.org> In-Reply-To: <20100908090842.GA87388@roberto-al.eurocontrol.fr> References: <20100831215915.GE1932@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100902214823.GB2542@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C811954.5040602@3mail4.co.uk> <20100903170241.GF1780@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C8232C6.9020108@DataIX.net> <4C8294B7.3010507@bellanet.org> <20100908090842.GA87388@roberto-al.eurocontrol.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/08/10 05:08, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Graham Todd: >> Thanks to you and other devs for all your careful work integrating ZFS >> into FreeBSD. It seems amazing that the patch for v28 *almost* even >> applies to 8-STABLE. > > Do you think you could generate a 8-STABLE patch or at least tell us where > it is failling please? thanks to jhell,v - who has already has attempted this and reported back :) see: http://bit.ly/d20tML and lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/019576.html "only 14 of the 293 files that were changed had rejects against a stable/8 that was patched to ZFSv15 + metaslab_v2 + abe_stat_rrwlock" I was unable to quite that far - I think because I applied the earlier patches in the wrong order. But I am impressed that adding a patch from CURRENT to go from ZFSv15 to ZFSv28 on the STABLE branch was that close to applying.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C878B9A.2000909>