Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:05:09 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/metapixel Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl> References: <201101152257.p0FMvSTR058827@repoman.freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101152358150.2354@gerinyyl.fvgr> <20110128212637.GB4687@lonesome.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102022359120.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr> <1297028744.16814.33.camel@hood.oook.cz> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011/02/07 00:18, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> (In my experience maintainers have been quite responsive, in fact I
> was truely impressed how 80% responded within days around the CPPFLAGS
> change.)
Guess your experience here is quite better than mine. Maybe it's because
you peddle wanted fixes and I usually report unwanted breakages? :)
My point was that you're never going to get 100% here, so in the end,
there always be some sum of work that will end being done by you.
Note that portmgr will issue you a blanket approval on changes to
individual ports regarding your infrastructure work.
Of course it is always good to work with maintainers. It's more
considerate to alert maintainer of the change than just go and change
the port behind his back.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D4FB5C5.2070404>