Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:49:26 +0200
From:      Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl>
To:        Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: poudriere sillieness re audio/libsamplerate & glib20
Message-ID:  <5163D616.4000905@rainbow-runner.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1365496402007-5802546.post@n5.nabble.com>
References:  <1365479312444-5802508.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAO%2BPfDfSk2uO7nmf3hU-gXCfGUzG2dsFJRvjxASkjnCLgzFsjQ@mail.gmail.com> <1365493098467-5802539.post@n5.nabble.com> <CA%2B7WWSe3Ghh76J2qKnwnC9yY%2B8tyofHxK_d4fjmtr9GkiFJxKw@mail.gmail.com> <1365496402007-5802546.post@n5.nabble.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9-4-2013 10:33, Beeblebrox wrote:
>>> How do you know it's supposed to be glib20 and not _glib20?
> I don't, but what I DO know is that after the 2 corrections (star1 and 2
> from post #2), the error messages in the form of 'Unknown component _glib20'
> cleared out and the dependent ports got built by poudriere. So that was
> Makefile related. If not, suggest how it is to be fixed so that the error no
> longer occurs.

Thats correct, _glib20 is removed in the gnome devel repo, because it no 
longer needed. The reason why ports use it was to avoid a dependancy on 
gamin and gio-fam-backend.

I admit that MC is currently unstable, but you should have mentioned if 
your using a non vanilla ports tree. Otherwise people will just assume 
your only having ports without extra patches.

-Koop

>>> Evenmore you haven't shown anything that would point to a problem in
>>> poudriere itself.
> a. First item in post #1? I asked if there is a way to get libsamplerate in
> poudriere
> b. My thread is not limited to problems with 2 ports, since there are a good
> number of problems which I am posting as fast as much as I can gather the
> details.
> c. As posted in #2: colord-0.1.20_1, libsoup-2.42.0, wxgtk2-common-2.8.12
> get built on host but not in poudriere. As shown, the errors are trivial
> (like 'cannot find sqlite3' when the sqlite3.txz is in fact located in the
> repo)  and furthermore, packages built manually and placed in the common
> repo are summarily deleted by poudriere at repo-check stage.
>
> What more does one need before referring to all of this as "sillieness"? I
> do not know where the source problem lies exactly, so I am reporting my
> findings.
>
>
>
> -----
> 10-Current-amd64-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3 & xorg.devel
> --
> View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/poudriere-sillieness-re-audio-libsamplerate-glib20-tp5802508p5802546.html
> Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5163D616.4000905>