Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:44:18 +0200 From: Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <BE2FA7D2-1266-496E-B808-55204B1AB21A@yahoo.com> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <20200904142255.GC80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <CACNAnaHRn5VGM8G6_kxj7S%2B0LQOSG3CK9=umxj74Qc5v%2BNOLeA@mail.gmail.com> <BE2FA7D2-1266-496E-B808-55204B1AB21A@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark, as far as I remember(didn=E2=80=99t work the last weeks on RPI-stuff) the dma-thing only failed on GENERIC-NODEBUG (unexpected controller = detection loops) =E2=80=A6 But it worked on GENERIC and afaik Greg_unrelenting`s dma-fix isn=E2=80=99= t yet merged to 13-current=20 because of that unfixed issue=E2=80=A6 (but you can apply his patch and test)..it should work under GENERIC = without the 3GB-limit(4GB & 8GB-models)=20 Klaus > Am 04.09.2020 um 19:33 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>: >>=20 >=20 > Has the mishandling of the DMA been fixed? I'm still back > at head -r363590 and it was not fixed as of then. I've > had to use the 3072 MiB limit in the uefi/ACPI selections > in order to have a reliable environment. >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360>