Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:58:02 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <72356.971193482@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:54:09 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001010095155.90573M-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001010095155.90573M-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robe rt Watson writes: > >On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:11:11AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: >> > > > > Do any committers have any objections to me disabling ntalk, finger, >> > > > > telnet, rsh, and ftp by default in -current? And sandboxing 'named' by >> > > > > default in -current? >> > >> > Won't this make it difficult to bootstrap a headless 1U box? >> >> The point, which many people in this discussion somehow keep missing, >> is that when you do a default installation of recent versions of >> FreeBSD, the machine reboots with ssh enabled and working. > >As I pointed out earlier, there needs to be a way for the administrator to >securely retrieve the SSH key so that they can log in securely. And as I pointed out earlier: having ssh doesn't help people who have only a windows box to connect from. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72356.971193482>