Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jan 2019 12:46:19 -0800
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kernel config question
Message-ID:  <792fec6e-2dcc-3fba-73d7-31e925cf2a13@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190102200226.GQ84895@home.opsec.eu>
References:  <23597.4315.739853.729163@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190102200226.GQ84895@home.opsec.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/2/19 12:02 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331659: Thu Mar 29 12:31:36 EDT 2018 amd64
>>
>> 	to CURRENT (as of last midnight.
>> 	Does this, in src/UPDATING:
>>
>> 	[8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries
>> 	needed to do an installworld, you must include the
>> 	COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in your kernel. [...]
> 
>> 	 (It seems ... irrational ... one would need compatibility stuff
>>  going back to FreeBSD 4 to rebuild/update FreeBSD 13.)
> 
> No, COMPAT_FREEBSD4 is not needed. Maybe COMPAT_FREEBSD11 is needed.

Yes, that text needs to be made more generic to say that you will need
COMPAT_FREEBSD<N-1>.  Though we've also had some major branches that
didn't get a COMPAT_FREEBSD<N> option.
-- 
John Baldwin

                                                                            



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?792fec6e-2dcc-3fba-73d7-31e925cf2a13>