Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:43:58 +0200 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What happened with the GlusterFS port? Message-ID: <7FAD7618-593D-4797-9EE9-BA36A87CE79B@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <CAKYr3zybY3hdXLpL-fCvqs%2B=syZ7uBE-FiXj%2BXcRGG1YoUZhOQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <28234312-7982-49F5-83FD-865649AA9CCB@ultra-secure.de> <1397850220.58880.16.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <CAKYr3zybY3hdXLpL-fCvqs%2B=syZ7uBE-FiXj%2BXcRGG1YoUZhOQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 18.04.2014 um 21:51 schrieb Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>: >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me> = wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 21:30 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > does anybody know where the effort to port GluserFS to FreeBSD went? > > > > There=92s this (very) outdated wiki-page: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS > > > > and there=92s the SoC project: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2013/GlusterFSport > > > > But nothing seems to have happened after it was finished. >=20 >=20 > The port made decent progress over the GSOC period, but no, it never > gained any traction to end up in the ports collection. >=20 >=20 That is very unfortunate. > not to hijack the thread but, glusters ancient, use riak-cs, or swift, = or port leofs > =20 >=20 Currently, the unavailability of GlusterFS in FreeBSD (vs. the = availability in Linux) is sort of a deal-breaker for some projects here. There are, regrettably, a large number of legacy applications the rely = on a traditional filesystem. An equally large number of customers continue to rely on these same = applications, for the foreseeable future (and they pay us to run the = stuff). Traditionally, I would have just suggested a ZFS NFS fileserver - but it = adds a single point of failure, manual failover with ZFS sends/HAST etc. GlusterFS would eliminate this (in situations where the customer needs a = number of servers anyway). I guess, it won=92t happen until somebody is paid to do it (SoC sort of = proofed that) - directly or indirectly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7FAD7618-593D-4797-9EE9-BA36A87CE79B>