Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:32:14 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Message-ID: <85e7850e-9f9b-4fe5-5d30-9f6fe8d07519@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <5A15E921.8000007@Wilcox-Tech.com> References: <faf60558-6657-8c1c-349f-3d4136a917a7@perceivon.net> <CANCZdfqYKFCoP2YZiDL3MjiOs2dRkWQ-LvkztVKB9wT41hbjEQ@mail.gmail.com> <5A15DDFA.8060302@Wilcox-Tech.com> <CANCZdfoteBgZq98msXbSX8qh-4En%2BES5KvN4RvAcUdRUicK2%2BA@mail.gmail.com> <5A15E921.8000007@Wilcox-Tech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/22/17 22:16, A. Wilcox wrote: > On 22/11/17 14:44, Warner Losh wrote: >> If there is no political agenda, then moving the entire thing to a port >> would have been the right thing to do – including the datfiles. >> >> >> No. That would also give the project's endorsement to it. Gone is 'no >> opinion at all' we have. > > > And *since* you have decided that "having a port" implies endorsement of > a project, before I archive this thread, here are a few more ports that > you should probably poke portmaster about: > Hi, The FreeBSD project already changed its logo to be more friendly and I think it is sad when people misunderstand the FreeBSD's Beastie trying to attribute myself as a FreeBSD developer certain attributes. Humor and irony is individual like Warner pointed out and some people will never understand it and take it literally instead. By deleting the non-FreeBSD fortunes are we certain we solve a problem and don't simply move it somewhere else? About offensive port names, how about "/usr/ports/print/removethedots" :-) --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85e7850e-9f9b-4fe5-5d30-9f6fe8d07519>