Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:56:51 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Further sh(1) plans Message-ID: <86wrtte830.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin4Dpspkud2GnYLfZyo33L9uwr9u2_UMRYi_jvE@mail.gmail.com> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Sun, 20 Jun 2010 02:08:57 -0700") References: <20100619113126.GB83874@stack.nl> <20100620090019.GA1731@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <AANLkTin4Dpspkud2GnYLfZyo33L9uwr9u2_UMRYi_jvE@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Allow me to inject some facts into a discussion which has so far been completely devoid of them: % strip static-sh-with* % size static-sh-with* text data bss dec hex filename 990367 17208 92136 1099711 10c7bf static-sh-with-completion 985735 17176 92104 1095015 10b567 static-sh-without-completion % echo $((990367-985735))=20 4632 % echo $((990367/985735.0)) 1.0046990316870152 Is a 0.47% increase really worth such a fuss? I would have thought that embedded systems would benefit the most from this, since they get a usable interactive shell (and don't tell me it doesn't need one) at a very small cost. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wrtte830.fsf>