Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:21:00 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bindat(2) and connectat(2) syscalls for review. Message-ID: <86y5enaan7.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20130216232039.GD2023@garage.freebsd.pl> (Pawel Jakub Dawidek's message of "Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:20:39 %2B0100") References: <20130213230354.GC1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130213232004.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130213234030.GD1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130214185549.GA36288@stack.nl> <86ip5saqiu.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20130216232039.GD2023@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> writes: > > > A flag parameter is a good thing; you may not know yet what you will > > > need it for. > > int bind(int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen); > > int connect(int s, const struct sockaddr *name, socklen_t namelen); > > Where's the flag argument? > The is no flag argument in my patch, but it was proposed by Kostik in > the e-mail Jilles replied to. That was a rhetorical question... unless Jilles wants to go through our entire code base and add a flag argument to every syscall or library function that doesn't already have one, "just in case". DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y5enaan7.fsf>