Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:15:44 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 (or more) LAN interface on SAME subnet ? Message-ID: <9512191615.AA14564@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199512190038.RAA13141@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <9512182157.AA08392@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199512190038.RAA13141@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 18 Dec 1995 17:38:36 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said: >> This is not true. The Internet Architecture requires that logical >> subnets be fully-connected. The BSD Architecture requires that every >> network interface be connected to a unique subnet. > You mean "logical network interface", right? No, I don't. I mean ``network interface driver instance''. > Otherwise you're saying you can't use bridges on subnets... No, I'm saying that you can use BSD to implement a bridge. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9512191615.AA14564>