Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:50:05 -0400
From:      Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
To:        Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: [GSoC] About the idea: Unicode support in vi
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimKzTrLA%2BW4a73D=aS8fy9npeqvrS8Ua3oNKrjf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLbU--J2aVa00tzxWb9GAvjfGnUGovwYaXXqhp@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTintkKzW=o%2B7Q53aMSpA1mmqC7aDF1wN8zHY_Wc%2B@mail.gmail.com> <86mxkm1erm.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTin3Wki6bnriNgWUy5JC68MDMVc4Y444tGWcKBQ7@mail.gmail.com> <86aaglx1ow.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTikLbU--J2aVa00tzxWb9GAvjfGnUGovwYaXXqhp@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I'm not sure whether the FreeBSD system administrators (who opens 100
>>> ssh sessions) agree with that to replace the nvi in base system with
>>> this one.
>>
>> Do they expect more features beyond POSIX vi?
>
> Like multiple windows. This has been discussed y other BSDs before.
>
For the reference, on the Linux side, busybox do all what an admin
would reasonably expect (I mean _all_ the basic userland, not just
editing text) in a binary smaller than nvi. Now, it's true that _you_
might not care about size/bloat, at least accept that some do.

 - Arnaud



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimKzTrLA%2BW4a73D=aS8fy9npeqvrS8Ua3oNKrjf>