Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:38:37 -0500 From: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> To: Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [GSoC] About the idea: Unicode support in vi Message-ID: <AANLkTin3Wki6bnriNgWUy5JC68MDMVc4Y444tGWcKBQ7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86mxkm1erm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <AANLkTintkKzW=o%2B7Q53aMSpA1mmqC7aDF1wN8zHY_Wc%2B@mail.gmail.com> <86mxkm1erm.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> wrote: > Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm a Computer Science student at Northern Illinois University, and I >> used FreeBSD for a long time. I'm interested in the idea that to >> improve the nvi in the base system. My proposal is slightly different: >> I want to fork nvi and make it iconv-awared (or mbyte-mode tunable, >> like tcsh), so that it can deal with more encodings. Can that be a >> GSoC project proposal? > > Why not just use "traditional vi"? > > =C2=A0http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/ (lives under editors/2bsd-vi) > > This one lacks of many feature, compared with nvi. I'm not sure whether the FreeBSD system administrators (who opens 100 ssh sessions) agree with that to replace the nvi in base system with this one. However, it's source code can be a great reference for a mbyte-capable nvi. --=20 Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin3Wki6bnriNgWUy5JC68MDMVc4Y444tGWcKBQ7>