Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:12:40 +0100 From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rcs is gone? Message-ID: <CADWvR2jsE_yF6FHXRNvqS2=wUGcbHcGUau%2BbcB90Lhog-6CQ3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca> References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca> <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 October 2013 22:08, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote: > > On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote: > > > I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files > on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, > sysctl.conf, a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a trivial way to maintain local > revision control. > > And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely > helpful with the installer scripts I write. ... and probably screw up change control management for those who use rcs for that... -- Igor M.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADWvR2jsE_yF6FHXRNvqS2=wUGcbHcGUau%2BbcB90Lhog-6CQ3A>